ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Sex, Gender, and Diversity in Sex Work Research.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This brief report responds to the call for commentaries in the Archives of Sexual Behavior (Zucker, 2025), in response to one of President Donald Trump's Executive Orders, inferring "sex" solely as an absolute binary biological categorization assigned at birth. According to the Order, acceptable terms of use are sex (which does not include the concept of "gender identity"), woman/women/girl(s), men/man/boy(s), female (as determined at conception), and male (as determined at conception). Our report traces the historical change in terminology related to sex and gender, in one specific area of research-the exchange of sexual services for money, material goods, or other services among consenting adults. We conducted a Web of Science search from 1900 to the current period, enumerating scholarly literature referencing terms related to "prostitution" or "sex work." Our findings show that the language has become less stigmatizing and more diverse over time. This is reflected in a growing scholarship on the diversity of genders who sell sexual services and the application of intersectional perspectives to sex work research. Importantly, our findings show that the terminology used by scholars to describe this profession has been neither uniform nor static, instead aligning with several historical milestones, including social justice movements, dedicated focus on women's health, and our expanded understanding of the sociology of sex work. At this juncture in time, we argue restricting scholarship on sex, and sexuality topics, including those related to sex work, will limit our ability to respond to intersecting social structures that prevent workers from accessing their rights to occupational health and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41239145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.