Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239116›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

The Silent Threat to Clinical Excellence: Ageism in Medicine.

Kelly Cheung

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kelly CheungUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. kellyccheung@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0009-0004-3090-4403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageism-the differential treatment of patients based on age-is a silent but pervasive threat to clinical excellence. Through the story of Ms. Thompson, a 72-year-old woman whose symptoms were dismissed as "normal aging" and whose cancer was diagnosed too late, this piece highlights the clinical consequences of unchecked age bias: missed diagnoses, undertreatment, and missteps in aligning care with what matters most to patients. Though often unconscious, ageist assumptions shape how we interpret symptoms, determine treatment plans, and communicate with older adults. Anchoring on age rather than individualized assessment compromises the precision and patient-centeredness that define high-quality care. This article explores how ageism is embedded in medical culture, training, and systems-and what clinicians, educators, and institutions can do to dismantle it. Addressing ageism is not just ethically urgent-it's a clinical and financial imperative. Because one day, we too will be that older patient, worthy of the same excellence we strive to deliver.

Indexed as

AgeismAgingAgedFemaleHumansPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID41239116
PMCPMC13083737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.