ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Influence of fracture morphology and working length on shear motion and construct stiffness in osteosynthesis constructs.
Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConstruct stability is a key factor in fracture healing and is influenced by fracture morphology, working length, and fixation strategy. While osteotomized fracture models are widely used for biomechanical testing, their relevance to real, interdigitated fracture patterns remains unclear.
methodsThis study compared the axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and interfragmentary shear motion of synthetic distal femur models with osteotomized and realistic fractures. All constructs were tested under axial and torsional loading while progressively reducing the number of diaphyseal screws from five to two, thereby increasing the working length. Realistic fractures with a gap were analyzed in both an "open" state (prior to contact) and a "contact" state (after fragment contact. Shear displacements were quantified as resultant vectors derived from 3D motion tracking.
resultsFracture morphology and screw number significantly affected construct stiffness and shear motion. Osteotomized fractures showed higher axial stiffness (up to 997 N/mm in OC) compared to realistic fractures (up to 792 N/mm in RC), while realistic fractures without a gap exhibited superior torsional stability (up to 7.4 Nm/° in RC). Increasing working length reduced axial stiffness by up to -24% and torsional stiffness by up to -51%. Shear displacement increased with reduced screw number, particularly in constructs with a fracture gap.
conclusionRealistic fractures exhibit complex and direction-dependent stabilization mechanisms that are not captured by osteotomized models. Working length strongly influences construct behavior across all configurations. This study highlights the biomechanical differences between osteotomized and realistic fractures. Osteotomized models remain valuable as reproducible worst-case scenarios, whereas realistic fractures provide complementary insights by capturing stabilizing mechanisms such as fragment interlocking. Both approaches should therefore be combined in biomechanical research. Clinically, the results underline the importance of anatomical reduction and fixation planning to maximize construct stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.