Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239033›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Functional Bioink and 3D Bioprinting Tissue Scaffold Applications for Spinal Cord Injury.

Seydanur Yücer, Begüm Sarac, Ali Can Özarslan, Deniz Sakarya, Esma Ahlatcıoğlu Özerol, Fatih Ciftci

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seydanur YücerFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Begüm SaracFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Can ÖzarslanDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz SakaryaInstitute of Nanotechnology and Biotechnology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Esma Ahlatcıoğlu ÖzerolDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatih CiftciFaculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Istanbul, Turkey. fciftci@fsm.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-2404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI), commonly resulting from sudden trauma such as traffic or sports accidents, leads to severe disruption of axonal connections and loss of sensory and motor function below the injury site. Despite numerous therapeutic efforts, effective strategies for neural repair remain limited. Tissue engineering has emerged as a promising approach for axonal regeneration, particularly through the design of three-dimensional (3D) polymeric scaffolds that can restore the structural and functional integrity of the injured spinal cord. This review focuses on recent advances in biomaterials and scaffold designs developed for SCI repair, emphasizing the role of nanocomposite systems that combine graphene oxide (GO), synthetic polymers such as PLGA-PEG, and bioactive ceramics like hydroxyapatite (HA). These hybrid materials offer improved biocompatibility, mechanical matching with spinal tissue, and enhanced cellular adhesion and guidance cues for axonal growth. The synergistic integration of these components enables the fabrication of multifunctional scaffolds capable of supporting stem cell differentiation and neurotrophic factor delivery. By critically summarizing the key parameters influencing scaffold performance, such as microarchitecture, surface modification, and mechanical compliance, this work outlines a framework for developing next-generation 3D nanocomposite scaffolds for SCI regeneration. The proposed approach highlights how GO/PLGA-PEG/HA systems can bridge the gap between experimental tissue engineering and clinically translatable neuroregenerative therapies.

Indexed as

BioprintingPrinting, Three-DimensionalSpinal Cord InjuriesTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsGraphiteHumansNanocompositesNerve RegenerationBiocompatible Materialsgraphene oxideGraphiteAxonal regenerationGraphene oxideHydroxyapatiteScaffoldSpinal cord injurySynthetic polymersTissue engineering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.