ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
Predicting multiple organ failure after major orthopedic interventions is possible using only conventional laboratory tests.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe decision to delay secondary, non-life-saving orthopedic surgery to reduce the risk of multiple organ failure (MOF) or sepsis is largely based on expert opinion. A decision-making tool may solve this problem by pre-operatively reflecting the patient's inflammatory/coagulation status. We aimed to determine whether the combination of readily available measures of inflammation and coagulation could predict MOF/sepsis in polytrauma patients.
methodsWe conducted a prospective single-center study of adult trauma patients requiring pelvic/acetabular surgery. Patients were recruited from October 2011-January 2018. The primary outcome was postoperative MOF and sepsis. Full blood count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, complement C3 and C4, C-reactive protein, tryptase, cortisol, and interleukin-6 were collected preoperatively and 30 min, 1 day, and 3 days postoperatively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to cluster the data within and across time. Logistic regression was used to predict MOF or sepsis using the top 4 principal components.
resultsA total of 157 patients were recruited. The incidence of MOF and sepsis was 7% and 13%, respectively. PCA of preoperatively-collected immune and coagulation markers predicted MOF (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94). Using routine tests alone predicted MOF with an AUC of 0.94. Sepsis was predictable with less accuracy than MOF from PCA (preoperative-AUC: 0.76).
conclusionThe routine clinical data available prior to non-life-saving definitive pelvic/acetabular surgery could predict MOF, and may serve as a tool for orthopedic surgeons to optimise the timing of surgery. Multi-centre, prospective investigation is required for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41239021What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.