ArticleActa parasitologica2025
Molecular Characterization of Zoonotic Intestinal Protozoa in Three Wildlife in Hebei Province, China.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Colpodellosis: IsPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAs an important component of ecosystems, wildlife plays a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance. However, wild animals are also natural hosts of pathogens. In this study, fecal samples from three of wild animals were collected from Hebei Xiaowutai Mountain National Nature Reserve in Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, China. Species identification of these samples was performed, and the infection status of common zoonotic protozoa in these three wild animal species was detected.
methodsCommon zoonotic protozoa were detected after species identification by PCR.
resultsThe results of species identification showed that the fecal samples were from red fox (Vulpes vulpes), leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis), and wild boar (Sus scrofa). Colpodella spp. was detected in red fox, with the closest phylogenetic relationship being to Colpodella spp. from Lake Luxembourg (NCBI accession number: GU067926.1); Giardia intestinalis (G. intestinalis) was detected in leopard cat, with the closest phylogenetic relationship to G. intestinalis assemblage F (NCBI accession number: LC341258.1).
conclusionsThe results showed that wild animals are affected by intestinal protozoan infection and that there is a risk of parasite transmission. The prevention and control of parasitic diseases in wild animals is not only conducive to the protection of animal welfare but also to public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41239015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.