ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[COVID-19 outbreaks in precarious living and working conditions: findings from an after-action review and recommendations for public health services].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges for the public health service (ÖGD) in Germany, particularly during outbreaks in precarious living and working conditions.
methodsAs part of an after-action review (AAR) conducted in May 2023, 29 professionals from public health offices and other authorities analyzed nine such outbreak events from 2020 to 2022 based on the methodological recommendations of the World Health Organization and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The aim was to identify key challenges and successful approaches in the areas of "preparedness and response" and "public health and social measures" and to derive practical recommendations for future action.
resultsThe two-day online event facilitated active discussions, which were documented and consolidated with the participants. Major challenges identified included official communication with the public, civil society, and businesses; intersectoral collaboration with diverse stakeholders; and the ÖGD's structural preparedness for complex situations. At the same time, numerous examples of good practice were documented-such as cross-sectoral cooperation, the development of internal structures, and target group-specific communication. Based on these findings, participants developed recommendations to strengthen crisis management in future outbreaks in precarious settings. DISCUSSION: AARs are accepted and applicable tools for structured analysis of epidemic situations and for knowledge transfer within the ÖGD and can thereby contribute to improved preparedness for future crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.