ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026
[Reduction and discontinuation of antipsychotic drugs in outpatient practice: perspectives of psychiatrists].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntipsychotic medications (AP) are a central component in the treatment of psychotic disorders. The question arises how to balance long-term pharmacological treatment with the possibility of reduction or discontinuation (R&D). The German S3 guidelines for schizophrenia provide a general framework for R&D but concrete recommendations for practical implementation are still lacking.
objectiveThis qualitative study aims to explore the attitudes, challenges and reduction strategies of outpatient psychiatrists in Berlin and Brandenburg regarding the R&D of antipsychotics, in order to draw conclusions about the current state of care and potential gaps in service provision. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this study 10 semi-structured interviews with outpatient psychiatrists and one focus group with psychiatrists were conducted. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsThe participating psychiatrists predominantly favored an individualized and gradual approach to reducing antipsychotics. While some reported feeling confident and drew on their own clinical experience, others expressed considerable uncertainty and concern regarding the discontinuation process. This uncertainty was partly attributed to a perceived lack of specific guidance for practical implementation, which led to a sense of individual responsibility. Structural barriers, such as limited psychosocial support services and the lack of availability of finely graduated dosage forms, further hinder the implementation of effective reduction strategies. DISCUSSION: A clearer position in clinical guidelines, including more specific recommendations on R&D, could help reduce uncertainty among psychiatrists. Furthermore, enhanced psychosocial and psychotherapeutic support services would be necessary to enable a safe R&D process in outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.