Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238953›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026

[Reduction and discontinuation of antipsychotic drugs in outpatient practice: perspectives of psychiatrists].

Guillermo Ruiz-Pérez, Nastja Ulrich, Joshua Bettin, Julia Lippert, Thomas Koch, Sebastian von Peter

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillermo Ruiz-PérezZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland. guillermo.perez@mhb-fontane.de.
Nastja UlrichZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland.
Joshua BettinZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland.
Julia LippertZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland.
Thomas KochZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland.
Sebastian von PeterZentrum für seelische Gesundheit, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Seebad 82/83, 15562, Rüdersdorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic medications (AP) are a central component in the treatment of psychotic disorders. The question arises how to balance long-term pharmacological treatment with the possibility of reduction or discontinuation (R&D). The German S3 guidelines for schizophrenia provide a general framework for R&D but concrete recommendations for practical implementation are still lacking.

objectiveThis qualitative study aims to explore the attitudes, challenges and reduction strategies of outpatient psychiatrists in Berlin and Brandenburg regarding the R&D of antipsychotics, in order to draw conclusions about the current state of care and potential gaps in service provision. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study 10 semi-structured interviews with outpatient psychiatrists and one focus group with psychiatrists were conducted. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe participating psychiatrists predominantly favored an individualized and gradual approach to reducing antipsychotics. While some reported feeling confident and drew on their own clinical experience, others expressed considerable uncertainty and concern regarding the discontinuation process. This uncertainty was partly attributed to a perceived lack of specific guidance for practical implementation, which led to a sense of individual responsibility. Structural barriers, such as limited psychosocial support services and the lack of availability of finely graduated dosage forms, further hinder the implementation of effective reduction strategies. DISCUSSION: A clearer position in clinical guidelines, including more specific recommendations on R&D, could help reduce uncertainty among psychiatrists. Furthermore, enhanced psychosocial and psychotherapeutic support services would be necessary to enable a safe R&D process in outpatient settings.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAntipsychotic AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelDrug TaperingPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaFemaleGermanyHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPsychiatristsAntipsychotic AgentsDiscontinuationNeurolepticsReductionSchizophreniaShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41238953
PMCPMC13550059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.