Large language model as a clinical decision support tool in the initial management of critically ill children: a pilot evaluation.

Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are being explored as clinical decision support tools, but their reliability in pediatric acute care remains uncertain. This pilot study assessed ChatGPT-4.0's performance in the early management of critically ill children using real-world clinical data. We retrospectively analyzed 20 children emergently admitted from the emergency department (ED) to a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). ChatGPT-4.0 was prompted at four time points: ED arrival (diagnostic and therapeutic plans), ED transfer (differential diagnosis and hospitalization decision), PICU admission (diagnostic and therapeutic plans), and 24 h into PICU stay (differential diagnosis). Outputs were compared to actual care and evaluated for accuracy, safety, and omissions. At ED and PICU admission, 94% (95% CI, 91-97%) and 98% (95% CI, 95-99%) of diagnostic recommendations were rated as appropriate. Only 82% (95% CI, 76-87%) of therapeutic recommendations were considered appropriate at both points (p < 0.001). Potentially harmful therapeutic suggestions were more common than diagnostic ones: 7% vs. 2% in the ED (p = 0.016) and 10% vs. 0% in the PICU (p < 0.00001). In the PICU, critically missing therapeutic recommendations occurred at 0.95 per case, compared to 0.15 for diagnostic ones (p = 0.0073). The correct diagnosis appeared in 100% of ED discharge and 95% (95% CI, 85-100%) of PICU 24-h differentials. Triage decisions were accurate in all PICU cases.

conclusionChatGPT-4.0 showed good diagnostic and triage performance but requires caution, especially for therapeutic decisions and broader pediatric use. WHAT IS KNOWN: • LLMs like ChatGPT are being explored as clinical support tools. • Their diagnostic potential has been studied in adults, but pediatric data using real patient cases are limited. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first study evaluating ChatGPT in real PICU cases. • It showed good diagnostic and triage performance but requires caution, especially regarding therapeutic decisions.