ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Infraorbital Artery Perforator Flap: A Viable Option for Facial Defect Reconstruction Clinical Case Analysis and Preliminary Anatomical Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReconstruction of central facial regions, particularly the lower eyelid and lateral nasal areas, continues to pose significant challenges for plastic surgeons. These regions encompass multiple esthetic subunits, necessitating meticulous consideration of texture compatibility and tension-free closure within each unit. Although various perforator flaps-such as those based on the facial artery or supraorbital artery-have been employed for mid-cheek reconstruction, achieving optimal contour and esthetic integration of the periorbital and nasal subunits remains difficult. In this study, we investigate the application of an infraorbital artery (IOA) perforator flap for the reconstruction of the lower eyelid and lateral nasal region, aiming to improve postoperative esthetic outcomes.
methodsThis study provides an anatomical description and its clinical applications. In a cadaveric study, eight hemifaces were used to illustrate the precise location of the IOA, and the flap and artery pedicle were dissected to confirm surgical feasibility. Between August 2022 and May 2024, four patients underwent surgery with IOA perforator flaps to repair their lower eyelid or nose.
resultsAnatomical Study: In anatomical dissections, the mean distance between the infraorbital artery (IOA) and the infraorbital rim was 10.12 ± 1.10 mm, while the mean diameter of the IOA at its origin from the infraorbital foramen measured 1.50 ± 1.09 mm. During the dissection of the IOAP and its accompanying nerves, the mean diameter of the perforating vessels was approximately 0.5 mm. The length of the vascular pedicle that could be mobilized ranged from 2 to 4 cm. CLINICAL STUDY: In the clinical series, four patients underwent reconstruction with an IOA perforator flap. All flaps survived without signs of necrosis or vascular compromise, indicating excellent flap viability and reliable perfusion. According to the FACE-Q assessment scale, patients showed significant improvements in both esthetic appearance and functional outcomes.
conclusionsThe infraorbital artery perforator flap represents a feasible and effective option for the reconstruction of defects involving the nose and lower eyelid, offering superior contour restoration of the periorbital and nasal regions compared to alternative techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41238846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.