ArticleSpinal cord2026
"This trike is cool, but…": a qualitative study on real-world adoption of an outdoor mobility device in people with spinal cord injury.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designThis is a descriptive qualitative study.
objectivesTo explore factors influencing the adoption of innovative assistive outdoor devices in persons living with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), using a tricycle designed for people with reduced mobility as a case in point.
settingCommunity-based research conducted in Switzerland.
methodsTwenty-five participants with SCI used a tricycle for a period of six weeks. Data were collected via diaries, and semi-structured interviews conducted before and after the trial. Thematic analysis of the interviews was performed using MAXQDA software, combining deductive and inductive approaches.
resultsParticipants valued the tricycle's innovative design, therapeutic potential, and recreational use, especially in outdoor settings. However, challenges such as difficulty in maneuvering, incompatibility with routines, and perceived impracticality limited its acceptance. Contradictory feedback highlighted the variability in user needs, emphasizing that "one size does not fit all." Customization and user support were critical but did not fully address all limitations, as the tricycle was often deemed unsuitable for daily use.
conclusionsNovel outdoor mobility devices require an extended usability and lifestyle integration to meet diverse user needs. For individuals with SCI, compatibility, simplicity, and adaptability are crucial. Co-creation with users and flexible designs are essential to ensure new devices align with their lived experiences. SPONSORSHIP: No commercial sponsorship was involved in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41238843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.