ArticleScientific reports2025
Decoding brain structure-function dynamics in health and in psychosis via an autoencoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Composite reaction time and variability correlate with whole-brain white-matter characteristics.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the intricate relationship between brain structure and function is a cornerstone challenge in neuroscience, critical for deciphering the mechanisms that underlie healthy and pathological brain function. In this work, we present a comprehensive framework for mapping structural connectivity measured via diffusion-MRI to resting-state functional connectivity measured via magnetoencephalography, utilizing a deep-learning model based on a Graph Multi-Head Attention AutoEncoder. We compare the results to those from an analytical model that utilizes shortest-path-length and search-information communication mechanisms. The deep-learning model outperformed the analytical model in predicting functional connectivity in healthy participants at the individual level, achieving mean correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 in the alpha and beta frequency bands, in comparison to 0.45 for the analytical model. Our results imply that human brain structural connectivity and electrophysiological functional connectivity are tightly coupled. The two models suggested distinct structure-function coupling in people with psychosis compared to healthy participants ([Formula: see text] for the deep-learning model, [Formula: see text] in the delta band for the analytical model). Importantly, the alterations in the structure-function relationship were much more pronounced than any structure-specific or function-specific alterations observed in the psychosis participants. The findings demonstrate that analytical algorithms effectively model communication between brain areas in psychosis patients within the delta and theta bands, whereas more sophisticated models are necessary to capture the dynamics in the alpha and beta band.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.