Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238786›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Decoding brain structure-function dynamics in health and in psychosis via an autoencoder.

Qing Cai, Hannah Thomas, Vanessa Hyde, Pedro Luque Laguna, Carolyn B McNabb, Krish D Singh, Derek K Jones, Eirini Messaritaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qing CaiCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Hannah ThomasCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK. thomash66@cardiff.ac.uk.
Vanessa HydeCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Pedro Luque LagunaCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Carolyn B McNabbCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Krish D SinghCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Eirini MessaritakiCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Wellcome 227882/Z/23/ZWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096646/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 104943/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the intricate relationship between brain structure and function is a cornerstone challenge in neuroscience, critical for deciphering the mechanisms that underlie healthy and pathological brain function. In this work, we present a comprehensive framework for mapping structural connectivity measured via diffusion-MRI to resting-state functional connectivity measured via magnetoencephalography, utilizing a deep-learning model based on a Graph Multi-Head Attention AutoEncoder. We compare the results to those from an analytical model that utilizes shortest-path-length and search-information communication mechanisms. The deep-learning model outperformed the analytical model in predicting functional connectivity in healthy participants at the individual level, achieving mean correlation coefficients higher than 0.8 in the alpha and beta frequency bands, in comparison to 0.45 for the analytical model. Our results imply that human brain structural connectivity and electrophysiological functional connectivity are tightly coupled. The two models suggested distinct structure-function coupling in people with psychosis compared to healthy participants ([Formula: see text] for the deep-learning model, [Formula: see text] in the delta band for the analytical model). Importantly, the alterations in the structure-function relationship were much more pronounced than any structure-specific or function-specific alterations observed in the psychosis participants. The findings demonstrate that analytical algorithms effectively model communication between brain areas in psychosis patients within the delta and theta bands, whereas more sophisticated models are necessary to capture the dynamics in the alpha and beta band.

Indexed as

BrainPsychotic DisordersAdultAutoencoderBrain MappingDeep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41238786
PMCPMC12618595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.