ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Individual identification and kinship testing from hair shaft nuclear DNA: leveraging short amplicon strategy and bioinformatics models.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hair samples are commonly encountered at crime scenes. However, most of them are telogen hairs, from which only partial DNA profiles can be yielded. These profiles are generally insufficient for forensic human identification and kinship testing. In this study, we sequenced the hair roots and hair shafts from ten unrelated individuals using a short-amplicon panel, and evaluated the performance of hair shafts of different lengths in terms of genotype calling and genotype accuracy. We also employed a pseudohaploid genotype-based approach for kinship coefficient estimation and proposed an error model for likelihood ratio (LR) calculation. The results showed that many SNPs could be successfully recovered from the nuclear DNA of hair shafts. However, approximately 30% of the genotypes called were inconsistent with those of the hair roots, 17.32%, 71.88%, and 10.79% of which were drop-in, dropout, and switch errors, respectively. Five hair shafts were found to be contaminated by either the experimental operator or by other samples. A significant decrease in kinship coefficients was observed for related individuals with short hairs, while there was no significant difference for unrelated pairs. The overall accuracy was 55.15% for identical samples, parent-child relationships, and grandparent-grandchild relationships, which is 4.55 times that using KING. In terms of the LR model, the average effectiveness was 0.63, 0.41, and 0.32 for individual identification, paternity testing, and grandparent-grandchild testing, respectively when a 2 cm hair shaft was used; these values increased to 0.95, 0.93, and 0.74 when a 15 cm hair shaft was used. In addition, no unrelated pairs were incorrectly judged as related for individual identification and paternity testing. In conclusion, the short amplicon strategy and our proposed bioinformatics methods make it possible to perform human identification and kinship testing using nuclear DNA from hair shafts. However, contamination poses a substantial challenge when working with such low-quality DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41238783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.