ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of progesterone receptors with different cutoff values according to menopausal status in hormone-positive early breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of progesterone receptor (PR) expression level on breast cancer prognosis in relation to menopausal status is unclear. This study evaluated the impact of the association between PR expression level and menopausal status on prognosis in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (> 10%)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. We retrospectively identified 2,796 patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer and classified them into three groups based on PR expression levels: PR-high (> 10%), PR-low (1-10%), and PR-zero (< 1%). We compared the cumulative incidence of any recurrence (AR) and distant recurrence (DR) among the three groups by menopausal status. Over a median follow-up of 84.5 months, there were 324 AR and 264 DR events. In premenopausal patients, the PR-zero group (1,155 patients) had a significantly worse prognosis than did the PR-low (44 patients) and PR-high (60 patients) groups. Meanwhile, postmenopausal patients in the PR-zero (219 patients) and PR-low (167 patients) groups had similar prognosis, both significantly worse than the PR-high group (1,151 patients). Varying cutoff values of PR expression according to menopausal status could help determine more personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.