Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238696›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Identifying behavioral and biological predictors of cannabis vapor self-administration in rats.

Ginny I Park, Alexandra N Malena, Nicholas C Glodosky, Zachary D G Fisher, Carrie Cuttler, Savannah H M Lightfoot, Samantha L Baglot, Cayden Murray, Matthew N Hill, Ryan J McLaughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ginny I ParkDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, WA, USA.
Alexandra N MalenaDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, WA, USA.
Nicholas C GlodoskyDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6098-3465
Zachary D G FisherDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, WA, USA.
Carrie CuttlerDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5890-2985
Savannah H M LightfootDepartments of Cell Biology & Anatomy and Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Samantha L BaglotDepartments of Cell Biology & Anatomy and Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Cayden MurrayDepartments of Cell Biology & Anatomy and Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Matthew N HillDepartments of Cell Biology & Anatomy and Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ryan J McLaughlinDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, WA, USA. ryan.mclaughlin@wsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-0685

Funding

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) R21DA051689-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent wave of recreational cannabis legalization in the US has underscored the importance of identifying predictors of individual variability in cannabis use. While a subset of recreational cannabis users will go on to meet diagnostic criteria for cannabis use disorder, many do not, making it critical to characterize traits that confer both vulnerability and resilience. However, progress in identifying relevant predictors has been hindered by limited mechanistic insight and a lack of translationally relevant animal models of cannabis use. To address this, we employed a rat model of cannabis vapor self-administration that uses whole-plant cannabis extract and mimics the intrapulmonary route of intake typically used in humans. Using this model, we sought to identify behavioral and biological predictors of motivation to self-administer vaporized cannabis. Male and female Long-Evans rats (N = 48) underwent a battery of assays indexing behavioral domains aligned with the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) prior to self-administration training. After four weeks of cannabis vapor self-administration (1 h sessions daily), motivation for cannabis vapor was assessed via a 3-h fixed ratio escalation (FRE) procedure. A series of linear regressions revealed that Social Processes, Arousal/Regulatory Systems, Cognition, and Positive Valence domains significantly predicted the number of cannabis vapor deliveries earned during the FRE test. Specifically, higher basal corticosterone (CORT), lower morning anandamide, impaired set-shifting performance, superior visual cue discrimination, and more social grooming during adolescence each predicted responding for cannabis. The Negative Valence domain was not a significant predictor. A multivariate machine learning approach combining principal component analysis and permutation importance further identified basal CORT and set-shifting performance as the strongest predictors of responding for vaporized cannabis. These findings highlight individual differences in stress regulation and cognitive flexibility as possible risk factors for cannabis use propensity and demonstrate the utility of leveraging RDoC framework for identifying relevant phenotypes in rodents that may extend across human psychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

CannabisMotivationAdministration, InhalationAnimalsArachidonic AcidsCorticosteroneEndocannabinoidsFemaleMalePolyunsaturated AlkamidesRatsRats, Long-EvansSelf AdministrationanandamideArachidonic AcidsCorticosteroneEndocannabinoidsPolyunsaturated Alkamides

Identifiers

PMID41238696
PMCPMC13212592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.