ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating machine learning approaches for multiple attack classification with improved computational efficiency in IoT networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has introduced significant security challenges, making IoT networks increasingly vulnerable to cyber-attacks. This research study develops and evaluates a comprehensive approach for detecting and classifying Denial of Service, Distributed Denial of Service, and Mirai attacks in IoT environments using five supervised machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbors, applied to the CICIoT2023 dataset. Our methodology incorporates data preprocessing techniques, including undersampling for class imbalance, and implements three feature selection methods: Chi-square, Principal Component Analysis, and Random Forest Regressor. We thoroughly evaluate model performance by measuring accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and F1-score metrics. In addition, we assess computational efficiency by considering training and prediction times. Our results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, achieving the highest reported accuracy of 99.99% for the CICIoT2023 dataset, surpassing results reported in existing literature. Furthermore, our best-performing Decision Tree model exhibits significantly improved computational efficiency, with a 98.71% reduction in training time and a 99.53% reduction in prediction time compared to previous studies, while maintaining superior accuracy. This research contributes valuable insights into the effectiveness and efficiency of various machine learning approaches for IoT security, offering practical implications for developing robust and computationally efficient intrusion detection systems in resource-constrained IoT environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.