Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238669›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Weed control and environmental risk assessment of herbicides in a Brazilian Atlantic forest railway ecosystem.

Caio Antonio Carbonari, Plinio Saulo Simões, Renato Nunes Costa, Robinson Antonio Pitelli, Edivaldo Domingues Velini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caio Antonio CarbonariDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil. caio.carbonari@unesp.br.
Plinio Saulo SimõesDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Renato Nunes CostaDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil. renato.costa@unesp.br.
Robinson Antonio PitelliResearch, Development and Innovation, Ecosafe - Agricultura e Meio Ambiente, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Edivaldo Domingues VeliniDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weeds along railway lines pose serious operational and environmental challenges, particularly in protected natural areas where vegetation management must balance efficacy and ecological safety. The objective of this study was to select herbicides that are effective in controlling weeds and to evaluate the associated environmental risks. The experiment was conducted on a stretch of railway line in the Serra do Mar State Park, São Paulo, Brazil, with the application of single and mixed herbicides (glyphosate, indaziflam, imazapyr and saflufenacil). A phytosociological survey of the weed flora was performed, and the overall weed control and the control of the most common species (Glycine max, Paspalum spp, Commelina spp. and Digitaria spp.) were evaluated at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days after application. For the analysis of possible environmental risks associated with the use of these herbicides, quantification of the active ingredients and their most important metabolites in soil and water was performed. The weed community on the railroad was predominantly composed of exotic species. The combination of pre- and postemergent herbicides provided the highest percentages of control with the longest weed-free period. The herbicide concentrations detected in the soil and water on the railway line and in the immediate vicinity were much lower than the initial concentrations, with no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for the most sensitive organisms found in the literature. The use of these herbicides, under the conditions evaluated, was efficient in the management of weeds and was environmentally safe.

Indexed as

EcosystemForestsHerbicidesPlant WeedsWeed ControlBrazilEnvironmental MonitoringRisk AssessmentSoilHerbicidesSoilChemical controlEnvironmental behavior of herbicidesExotic speciesNo observed effect concentration - NOECRailway vegetation control

Identifiers

PMID41238669
PMCPMC12618539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.