ArticleScientific reports2025
Metamaterial absorber using cascaded ring resonators and optimization through machine learning for sensing applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-optimized graphene-integrated refractory metasurface for broadband solar energy harvesting.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tunable dual-band THz metamaterial absorber with regression-learning-enabled numerical redesign.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, a narrowband metamaterial absorber (MA) is designed using a cascaded ring resonator (RR) with a Metal-Insulator-Metal (MIM) structure. Conventional design methodologies such as finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method often rely on trial-and-error simulations, which are both computationally intensive and time-consuming. To address this challenge, we present a design framework based on the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). This hybrid approach, which combines neural networks and fuzzy logic, offers a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to FDTD optical simulations. This type of hybrid network is recognized for its capability to represent highly nonlinear and complex samples. To predict the absorption through the ANFIS, four geometrical parameters of the structure have been utilized as input variables. The performance of this model is assessed by employing a root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) as a criteria for the evaluation, with two membership functions (MF) and a 5-fold cross-validation. The RMSE (0.0811) and MAE (0.062) indicate that absorption can be predicted with high precision. Based on our results, ANFIS achieves approximately 90% time savings compared to the conventional FDTD method, while maintaining acceptable prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the comparison of our method with Random Forest and k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) shows that ANFIS yields lower prediction error. The results indicate that the proposed MA can achieve nearly perfect absorption at specific values of the geometrical parameters. As a key application, the proposed structure has been utilized as a sensor. The optimal results for two key factors are a sensitivity of 600 nm per refractive index unit (RIU) and a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 4 nm. Due to its compact size, perfect absorption, and tunability, the proposed MA offers diverse applications in solar cells, sensors, and stealth technology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.