ArticleScientific reports2025
Correlation of peripheral blood eosinophil counts with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) are a group of diseases that can lead to serious lethal and disabling consequences, in which inflammation plays a key role. Although the role of eosinophils as innate immune cells in cardiovascular disease has been extensively studied, their specific impact is unclear and conflicting findings exist. The aim of this research was to assess the potential association between eosinophil count and ASCVD in US adults and to identify specific populations more strongly associated with ASCVD through subgroup analyses. This study conducted a cross-sectional analysis based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2018. Eosinophil counts data were derived from laboratory test results, while the diagnosis of ASCVD was derived from a questionnaire completed by the participants, defined as the respondent having been told that they had at least one of congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, or stroke. A multivariate logistic regression model was used in the study to explore the potential association between eosinophil count and ASCVD. A total of 20,363 participants were enrolled in this study, including 2,256 patients with ASCVD. After multivariate logistic regression analyses and adjustment for relevant covariates, a significant positive association was found between eosinophil count and ASCVD. In addition, the subgroup analysis revealed an interesting finding: the association between eosinophil counts and ASCVD was more pronounced among older persons, smokers, and males. A positive correlation between eosinophil counts and ASCVD has been shown in the American adult population. In addition, in certain subpopulations-such as older persons, smokers, and males-the association between eosinophil counts and the occurrence of ASCVD appeared to be stronger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.