ArticleScientific reports2025
AMF-responsive nanobiomagnetite for targeted delivery of amphotericin B against Leishmania amazonensis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis remains a neglected tropical disease with limited treatment options. Available therapies include costly and toxic drugs for which recurrent cases of resistance are reported. Drug delivery systems based on the association of approved drugs and nanoparticles have improved pharmacological properties of the drug, such as targeted therapy, enhanced drug solubility, reduced side effects, and potentially lower doses required for effective treatment. In this study, we explored the in vitro potential use of the nanobiomagnetite produced by magnetotactic bacteria functionalized with amphotericin B against promastigotes of Leishmania amazonensis, one of the main pathogens of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Additionally, the antileishmanial activity of the nanoformulation was significantly increased in association with alternating magnetic field (AMF) exposure, indicating an advantage in the therapeutic efficacy of the drug, potentially leading to a combined therapy. In addition, to assess the preliminary safety of the nanoformulation, we assessed its cytotoxicity on HaCaT, hFB, and J774.16 cell lines; none of the tested nanoformulations were cytotoxic toward these cell lines, suggesting their potential for biocompatible therapeutic applications. Moreover, no significant nitric oxide production was detected with the nanoparticle's interaction on J774.16 macrophages. This finding is vital for further clinical considerations, as it reduces the risk of inflammatory responses. Thus, we demonstrated the biocompatibility and parasitic potential of functionalized nanobiomagnetite as an alternative AMF-responsive therapy in in vitro models. However, in vivo testing is still necessary to assess the nanoformulation activity against Leishmania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.