ArticleScientific reports2025
Robust learning for ridge-penalized quasi-GLMs under non-identical distributions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, robust estimation of model parameters has attracted considerable attention in statistics and machine learning, particularly in the context of modeling data with outliers and related inverse problems. This paper introduces a novel log-truncated minimization estimator and a corresponding stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm for quasi-generalized linear models. This approach provides a robust alternative to ordinary GLMs without assuming light-tailed error distributions. For independent non-identical distributed (i.n.i.d.) data, we derive non-asymptotic excess risk and [Formula: see text]-risk bounds using log-truncated Lipschitz losses, assuming only a finite β-th moment for [Formula: see text]. Notably, our estimator does not require higher moments or finite variance. Our contribution is to robustify the objective while allowing i.n.i.d. sampling. We also analyze the iteration complexity of SGD for finding stationary points of non-convex log-truncated minimization. Empirically, our SGD algorithm outperforms non-robust methods. We demonstrate its practical effectiveness through a real-data analysis of the German health care demand dataset using robust negative binomial regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.