ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of solvent and advanced extraction techniques for optimizing phytochemical yield and bioactivity of Matthiola ovatifolia (Boiss.) Aerial parts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of different solvents (ethanol, water, DMSO, and acetone) and extraction methods, conventional solvent extraction (CSE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and ultrasound-microwave-assisted extraction (UMAE), on the phytochemical composition and biological activities of the extracts prepared from the aerial parts of Matthiola ovatifolia Boiss. Total phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and saponins were spectrophotometrically measured. In addition, antioxidant, antibacterial, and cytotoxic activities against human hepatoma (Hep-G2) and human breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, antidiabetic properties, and the anti-inflammatory activity were also investigated. The results showed significant differences in total phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and saponins concentrations among different extraction methods. The ethanolic extract prepared using the MAE contained the highest total phenolics (69.6 ± 0.3 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry weight), total flavonoids (44.5 ± 0.1 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/g dry weight), total tannins (45.3 ± 0.5 mg catechin/g dry weight), total alkaloids (71.6 ± 0.2 mg atropine equivalent (AE)/g dry weight) and total saponins (285.6 ± 0.1 mg escin equivalent (EE)/g dry weight) as compared to the extracts obtained with the aid of other methods. The highest antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities were also found for the same extract. According to the obtained results, the MAE method was much more appropriate for the extraction of phytochemicals from the M. ovatifolia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.