Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41238571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of solvent and advanced extraction techniques for optimizing phytochemical yield and bioactivity of Matthiola ovatifolia (Boiss.) Aerial parts.

Majid Sharifi-Rad, Ippolito Camele, Pawel Pohl, Yugal Kishore Mohanta, Hazem S Elshafie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majid Sharifi-RadDepartment of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Water and Soil, University of Zabol, Zabol, 98613-35856, Iran. majidsharifirad@uoz.ac.ir.
Ippolito CameleDepartment of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, Potenza, 10 - 85100, Italy.
Pawel PohlDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Metallurgy, Faculty of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyspianskiego 27, Wroclaw, 50-370, Poland.
Yugal Kishore MohantaNano-biotechnology and Translational Knowledge Laboratory, Department of Applied Biology, University of Science and Technology Meghalaya, 9th Mile, Baridua, Ri-Bhoi-793101, Techno City, Meghalaya, India.
Hazem S ElshafieDepartment of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, Potenza, 10 - 85100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of different solvents (ethanol, water, DMSO, and acetone) and extraction methods, conventional solvent extraction (CSE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and ultrasound-microwave-assisted extraction (UMAE), on the phytochemical composition and biological activities of the extracts prepared from the aerial parts of Matthiola ovatifolia Boiss. Total phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and saponins were spectrophotometrically measured. In addition, antioxidant, antibacterial, and cytotoxic activities against human hepatoma (Hep-G2) and human breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, antidiabetic properties, and the anti-inflammatory activity were also investigated. The results showed significant differences in total phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and saponins concentrations among different extraction methods. The ethanolic extract prepared using the MAE contained the highest total phenolics (69.6 ± 0.3 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry weight), total flavonoids (44.5 ± 0.1 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/g dry weight), total tannins (45.3 ± 0.5 mg catechin/g dry weight), total alkaloids (71.6 ± 0.2 mg atropine equivalent (AE)/g dry weight) and total saponins (285.6 ± 0.1 mg escin equivalent (EE)/g dry weight) as compared to the extracts obtained with the aid of other methods. The highest antioxidant, antibacterial, cytotoxic, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities were also found for the same extract. According to the obtained results, the MAE method was much more appropriate for the extraction of phytochemicals from the M. ovatifolia.

Indexed as

PhytochemicalsPlant Components, AerialPlant ExtractsSolventsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsFlavonoidsHep G2 CellsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMCF-7 CellsPhenolsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsFlavonoidsHypoglycemic AgentsPhenolsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsSolventsAntibacterial activityBioactive compoundsBio-pharmaceutical propertiesMedicinal plantPhytochemicalsTherapeutic potential

Identifiers

PMID41238571
PMCPMC12618623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.