ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Risk of cancer among individuals with a history of bacterial sexually transmitted infections: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk of cancer among individuals with a history of bacterial sexually transmitted infections: A population-based study in Alberta, Canada.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated cancer risk among individuals with a prior bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis using a retrospective cohort study of all Albertan residents diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis during 2000-2014, that was then linked to the Alberta Cancer Registry. Follow-up started 5 years from their first bacterial STI diagnosis and continued until the first instance of a cancer diagnosis, death, or the study end date (December 31, 2019). Internal comparisons between the bacterial STI groups were undertaken using adjusted hazard ratios, while sex-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare cancer risk with the Alberta general population. The likelihood of developing cancer was largely comparable within the bacterial STI cohort, though head/neck cancer was more common after only gonorrhea exposure, and lung cancer was more common after only syphilis exposure. When compared with the general population, statistically significant SIRs were observed among females for cervical cancer (SIR = 1.9, 95%CI = 1.5, 2.3) and thyroid cancer (SIR = 0.8, 95%CI = 0.6, 0.9); females exposed to chlamydia with other STIs, or gonorrhea with other STIs, were also 3.2- and 2.9-times more likely to develop colon cancer, respectively. In males, statistically significantly associations were identified for cancer overall (SIR = 1.1, 95%CI = 1.0, 1.2) and Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR = 1.8, 95%CI = 1.0, 2.9); males exposed to chlamydia only were also 1.5- and 1.6-times more likely to develop prostate and testicular cancer, respectively, while males exposed to only syphilis were 2.4-times more likely to develop lung cancer. Our findings are consistent with common bacterial STIs being correlates of risk of certain cancers, although the possible etiologic mechanisms may be indirect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.