ArticleBMJ open2025
Patients' experiences of ward rounds in a Swedish context: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim was to explore patients' experiences of ward rounds in inpatient care.
designAn exploratory qualitative design was chosen, collecting data with one-to-one semistructured interviews, conducted from March to May 2023. An interview guide was used as a basis for the interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
settingA medical and a surgical ward at a medium-sized hospital in southern Sweden.
participantsPurposeful sampling was used to recruit patients aged 18 years or older. 16 patients were recruited with an age range of 38-72 years.
resultsThe findings showed that patients' experiences of ward rounds have a wide range of variation. The main theme was: 'The ward round as a bridge between patients' experiences and knowledge and healthcare professionals'. The main theme consisted of two subthemes, reflecting the variation in patients' experiences: 'Feeling of togetherness versus loneliness' and 'Getting answers or being left in limbo'. The subthemes also highlighted patients' experiences of factors that enabled satisfactory interactions between patients and healthcare professionals during ward rounds, such as comprehensible detailed information and supportive atmosphere, as well as experiences of factors that obstructed such interactions and caused patients to feel uncertainty.
conclusionsWard rounds in inpatient care play an important role for patient care and health, functioning as a bridge between patients and healthcare professionals. It is important for healthcare practitioners and policy-makers to create a model for ward rounds that can contribute to an open and supportive atmosphere as well as sharing comprehensible and detailed information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.