ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
A Comprehensive Approach to Achieving Door to Balloon Metric Sustainability.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past 5 years, our teams have focused on establishing an American College of Cardiology Chest Pain Center-accredited percutaneous coronary intervention program. Our initiatives have concentrated on achieving defect-free care, optimizing standardization of acute coronary syndrome management, and reducing door to balloon (D2B) times. Preserving these initiatives can be challenging for a 220-bed, community-based hospital due to increasing health care demands and resource constraints. However, our commitment to integrating sustainability principles into D2B workflow optimization ensures long-term performance without compromising care quality. After the implementation of sustainability practices, the proportion of patients meeting ≤90-minute D2B benchmark increased from 79.3% to 98.0%. Key interventions included streamlined documentation, efficient emergency department processes, and coordinated cardiac catheterization laboratory workflows. These results reflect ongoing process optimization, enhanced interdepartmental coordination, and sustained adherence to evidence-based protocols. Sustaining excellence requires more than commitment. Measuring, quantifying, communicating, and sharing the impact reducing D2B time has on patient outcomes creates value for everyone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.