ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Radiation Dose Optimization in a Multicenter CCTA Program.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExcessive radiation exposure from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) increases lifetime malignancy risk. Internal review within a 5-hospital health system revealed median system-wide doses above best-practice targets, with high intercampus variability. PROJECT RATIONALE: Dose optimization is a modifiable patient safety measure supported by national guidelines, with evidence that reduction can be achieved without loss of diagnostic quality. PROJECT SUMMARY: Implementation of standardized, evidence-based CCTA protocols across the health system reduced the median radiation dose from 6.2 millisievert (mSv) to 4.8 mSv (23% reduction) while improving diagnostic acceptance from 90.5% to 92.7% (P = 0.019). Improvements were consistent across campuses despite equipment variability and were sustained through ongoing monitoring, staff education, and leadership engagement. This initiative provides a scalable model for achieving ≤4 mSv best-practice targets in multicenter cardiovascular imaging programs. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Tracking radiation doses is imperative. Standardized, evidence-based protocols can achieve sustainable CCTA radiation dose reduction across diverse campuses without compromising diagnostic quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.