ReviewAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2026
What is Medicare Advantage and Why is it the Most Important Contemporary Policy Affecting Kidney Disease?
Review in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment among patients receiving dialysis has surged following the passage of the 21st Century Cures Act, which lifted prior restrictions on enrollment. As MA becomes the plurality payer for dialysis, understanding its implications for patients, providers, and policymakers is critical. MA offers out-of-pocket spending caps and additional services not covered under fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. Some plans also prioritize care coordination, which may improve patient outcomes. However, concerns remain regarding limited provider networks, prior authorization barriers, and disparities in access to medications and transplants. The increasing shift to MA also challenges value-based care models, as most quality measures and payment models for patients receiving dialysis are limited to FFS Medicare. Although research examining the benefits and downsides of MA is paramount, a comparison of MA versus FFS Medicare is complicated by selection bias and incomplete or inaccessible data. To ensure that increasing enrollment into MA has not harmed patients, policymakers must enhance data fidelity and transparency, strengthen regulatory oversight, and align financial incentives across populations to safeguard access to high-quality care for patients receiving dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.