ArticleNeuroscience2025
Dual endomembrane recycling pathways function in parallel to support synapse maintenance and plasticity.
Article in Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SNX27-Retromer and more recently discovered SNX17-Retriever complexes are key drivers in recycling internalized cargoes back to the cell surface in eukaryotic cells, but the extent to which these pathways have unique or redundant roles in neurons is not known. Here, we show similar, but non-overlapping, roles of the SNX17-Retriever and SNX27-Retromer pathways in the maintenance and plasticity of excitatory synapses. We find that in vivo disruption of either pathway in developing rats leads to a marked loss of excitatory synapses in CA1 pyramidal neurons, a phenotype that is recapitulated in cultured hippocampal neurons. Further analysis in cultured neurons confirms that SNX17 and SNX27 colocalize prominently with each other and Retriever/Retromer in early endosomes, indicating a largely shared cellular localization of the two pathways. Interestingly, coordinate disruption of both pathways produced an additive loss of excitatory synapses, suggesting parallel roles in synapse maintenance. We further show that certain cargoes are specific for each pathway and that both recycling pathways are essential for numerous forms of synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD), and homeostatic synaptic scaling. Together, our results support a model where the SNX17-Retriever and SNX27-Retromer pathways function largely in parallel at synapses, with their combinatorial action a key requirement for long-lasting forms of synaptic plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.