ReviewJournal of radiation research2025
Drosophila melanogaster: an old and future ally to radiobiology.
Review in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of X-Ray Irradiation Responses Identifies Candidate Biomarker Genes inInsects · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From simple viruses to complex multicellular animals, ionizing radiation can have deleterious effects on all organisms. For humans, exposure to radiation can come from a wide range of sources such as environmental contamination, occupational hazards, radiotherapy and space flight. In the next few decades, radiation toxicity will become an increasing healthcare concern as nuclear power usage, risk of nuclear war, space-based industry and cancer incidence are all projected to increase. While the biology of acute radiation sickness is relatively well understood, ionizing radiation can also cause severe chronic effects whose molecular and cellular basis remain largely a mystery. This is partly because complications that arise months or even years after exposure depend on tissue-level responses, and so there are aspects of late radiation toxicity that can only be investigated in vivo. We suggest that Drosophila melanogaster can contribute to understanding this phenomenon. To this date, Drosophila radiation research has been heterogenous in terms of dose, radiation type and developmental stage of exposure, but despite this a pattern of observations suggest that fruit flies experience both short- and long-term radiation injury. Moreover, the genetic underpinning of the Drosophila radiation response seems conserved with that of humans. We propose that Drosophila is well-suited to model radiation damage to tissues, highlighting the potential of the fly to inform clinical radiobiology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.