ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
Stimulus Labels Support Declarative but Not Procedural Memory in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChildren with hearing loss show deficits in sequential learning, a form of procedural memory, and often perform poorly on verbal serial recall, a form of declarative memory. The current study examines sequential learning and serial recall in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users with young ages of implantation. Additionally, it investigates the role of rehearsal on procedural and declarative memory as well as whether rehearsal interferes with the ability to generalize procedurally learned sequences to declarative serial recall.
methodSixty children (21 with CIs who primarily use spoken English; 39 typically hearing), ages 7-15 years, completed two serial reaction time (SRT) tasks: one used stimuli that could be easily verbalized (i.e., "Color" SRT); the other used spatial stimuli (i.e., "Monster" SRT). After each SRT task, children completed a serial recall task in which half of the trials incorporated the procedurally learned sequence.
resultsBayesian statistical analyses reveal that, in contrast to previous findings, hearing status did not predict performance on either sequential learning or serial recall. On the declarative serial recall task, all children benefited from easily accessible labels; they also benefited from prior procedural learning, but only when labels were not easily accessible.
conclusionsSerial recall is supported by numerous strategies-including rehearsal and prior sequence learning. Notably, children with CIs also use these strategies. We also demonstrate a common asymmetry observed in adulthood: Serial recall of easy to label items was best predicted by language abilities, whereas serial recall of difficult to label items was best predicted by nonverbal IQ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.