ArticleNeural computation2025
Neural Associative Skill Memories for Safer Robotics and Modeling Human Sensorimotor Repertoires.
Article in Neural computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern robots face a challenge shared by biological systems: how to learn and adaptively express multiple sensorimotor skills. A key aspect of this is developing an internal model of expected sensorimotor experiences to detect and react to unexpected events, guiding self-preserving behaviors. Associative skill memories (ASMs) address this by linking movement primitives to sensory feedback, but existing implementations rely on hard-coded libraries of individual skills. A key unresolved problem is how a single neural network can learn a repertoire of skills while enabling integrated fault detection and context-aware execution. Here we introduce neural associative skill memories (neural ASMs), a framework that uses self-supervised temporal predictive coding to integrate skill learning and expression using biologically plausible local learning rules. Unlike traditional ASMs, which require explicit skill selection, neural ASMs implicitly recognize and express skills through contextual inference, enabling fault detection using "predictive surprise" across the entire learned repertoire. Compared to recurrent neural networks trained using backpropagation through time, our model achieves comparable qualitative performance in skill memory expression while using local learning rules and predicts a biologically relevant speed-versus-accuracy trade-off. By integrating fault detection, reactive control, and skill expression into a single energy-based architecture, neural ASMs contribute to safer, self-preserving robotics and provide a computational lens to study biological sensorimotor learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.