Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41237291›Full record

ArticleJMIR nursing2025

Exploring the Intersection of Nursing Leadership and Artificial Intelligence: Scoping Review.

Jessica S Burford, Richard G Booth, Amanda McIntyre

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica S BurfordArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, Room 3306, FIMS & Nursing Building, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada, 1 519-661-3395.ORCID 0000-0002-2837-2397
Richard G BoothArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, Room 3306, FIMS & Nursing Building, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada, 1 519-661-3395.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-9954
Amanda McIntyreArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, Room 3306, FIMS & Nursing Building, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada, 1 519-661-3395.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-0909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As artificial intelligence (AI) technology permeates health care settings, nurse leaders must position themselves to shape its development, implementation, and impact, guiding meaningful change that benefits nurses and care delivery. Nurse leaders possess the capacity to influence decisions, shape practice, and ensure the delivery of ethical, safe, and high-quality care. While AI technology is reshaping many aspects of health care delivery, there is limited knowledge on how nurse leaders perceive and experience this shift. Objective: This scoping review aimed to explore the intersection of nursing leadership and AI technology in health care by mapping current evidence, identifying key concepts, and highlighting knowledge gaps within the literature. Methods: This scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported on using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. A systematic search of 4 electronic databases (CINAHL [EBSCO Information Services], Ovid MEDLINE [Wolters Kluwer], PsycINFO [American Psychological Association], and Scopus [Elsevier]) was conducted for English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between 2014 and 2025. Gray literature was also reviewed. Articles were included if they met the inclusion criteria by exploring the population of nurse leaders and the concept of AI technology within the context of health care settings and were published in English from May 2014 forward. A total of 26 articles were included in the analysis. Qualitative content analysis and numerical summary supported the inductive identification and synthesis of data categories. Results: Of the 26 articles included, 8 were empirical (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods), and 18 were conceptual or theoretical articles. Although 1 article was Canadian, there were no empirical studies conducted by Canadian researchers. The qualitative content analysis of the primary search findings revealed 6 overarching data categories: (1) leading digital transformation and technology integration, (2) AI technology and the nursing role: reshaping practice, (3) ethical considerations of AI technology for nurse leaders, (4) AI technology as a facilitator of innovative leadership, (5) education and training on AI technology in nursing practice, and (6) influence of AI technology on the work environment. Conclusions: This review confirms that nurse leaders play an essential role in shaping the future of health care in the context of AI technology. Although this review highlights a growing recognition of nursing leadership as a crucial driver of AI technology integration in health care, there is a lack of research to guide practice, policy, and leadership development through education, despite emerging interest and a recent increase in empirical work. The findings accentuate the need for increased investment in nurse-led research and leadership development to ensure that AI systems are designed, implemented, and evaluated in a manner that upholds ethical care, equity, and professional nursing values. As health care systems increasingly adopt AI technology, nurse leaders must be equipped with the knowledge, tools, and support required to lead transformative change and act as AI technology directors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLeadershipHumansartificial intelligence: AI technologydigital healthleadership developmentnursing leadershipscoping reviewwork environment

Identifiers

PMID41237291
PMCPMC12617831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.