ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Environmental context shapes sex-specific costs of reproduction in a dioecious plant.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsTrade-offs between current reproduction and future performance are fundamental constraints on evolution. In dioecious plants, females and males can differ in how much of a limiting resource they allocate to reproduction, creating trade-offs that could be sex specific and environmentally dependent. If so, physiological differences in resource use are expected to coincide with differential costs of reproduction for females versus males, but how these costs are expressed across environmental contexts remains poorly understood.
methodsWe tested the hypothesis that the expression of sex-specific reproductive trade-offs is environmentally dependent in dioecious broadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia). We conducted a 2-year common garden experiment manipulating nutrient availability and reproductive investment to quantify sex-specific physiological costs using photosynthetic measurements and indices of nitrogen content. KEY
resultsAs expected, the expression of reproductive trade-offs depended on both sex and resource availability. At the lowest nutrient level, males experienced reproductive costs as reduced leaf nitrogen content and photosynthesis following flowering in year 1 and as reduced leaf nitrogen content and size in year 2. Across all nutrient conditions, females showed fewer detectable physiological costs.
conclusionsTogether with results from previous studies of S. latifolia, our study shows that males and females incur reproductive costs in different physiological currencies, with males allocating more nitrogen than females. These costs become evident only under nitrogen limitation, highlighting how environmental context governs the expression of sex-specific life-history trade-offs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.