ArticleJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
Nephrologists' perceptions of competencies acquired during medical residency in Nephrology and their applicability to daily clinical practice.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe medical residency (MR) curriculum underwent a reformulation, and in 2021, the competency matrix for MR in nephrology was published. This study aimed to evaluate nephrologists' perceptions of the competencies acquired during residency and their relevance in clinical practice.
methodThis was a cross-sectional study conducted using a self-administered electronic questionnaire, which included demographic data, information on professional practice, and an assessment of both the learning and the usefulness of the skills acquired during the MR program in nephrology. Participants responded to questions on a five-point Likert scale. Only nephrologists who had graduated from programs accredited by the Brazilian Ministry of Education were included.
resultsA total of 163 nephrologists from different states in Brazil were included. Most considered the clinical skills acquired to be useful for practice, except for palliative care, in which 54% felt capable, although 93.2% considered it essential. Procedures for which usefulness exceeded self-reported competence included fundoscopy, insertion of permanent hemodialysis catheters, insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters, and ultrasonography. Furthermore, less than 40% of participants reported feeling prepared to engage in management, clinical research, and teaching activities, despite perceiving their relevance.
conclusionThe study highlights nephrologists' perceptions of competencies acquired during MR and underscores the need for improvements in nephrology training, particulary in management, teaching, and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.