ArticlePloS one2025
Unpacking musical beauty: Sound, emotion, and impact differences across expertise and personality.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Portuguese Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Brief Scale of Mood Regulation Through Music (B-MMR) with Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beauty is an aesthetic quality that many composers and performers strive to attain and that most listeners value highly in music. Yet, what listeners hear and feel when they find music beautiful, the impact this experience has on them, and wherein lie any potential individual differences remain unclear. To address these gaps, an online questionnaire was administered to 81 adults. They described their experience of listening to three self-selected "beautiful pieces of music" alongside three pieces they listened to a lot but did not consider beautiful; focusing on each piece's sonic features, emotions induced, and any impact engaging with the pieces had had on them. Respondents' personality traits and level of musical training were also collected to explore if these contributed significantly to variability in the data. Thematic analysis of text responses showed that participants consider intrinsic features of the music (mellow timbre, pleasing melodies and harmonies, slow tempo), cognitive factors (degree of change, complexity levels, and repetition), and aesthetic criteria (emotional effects, presence of a message, expressivity) when judging the beauty of a piece. It also showed that, beyond being calming and evoking pleasant sadness, pieces perceived as beautiful tend to move, transport and emotionally resonate with the listener, inspiring musical activities, and providing strong emotional support. Exploratory, quantitative analyses revealed that amateur musicians and open individuals reported a wider range of contributing musical features, while both amateur and professional musicians, along with conscientious individuals, reported a broader range of musical beauty's influence on their musical activities. Our study suggests that musical beauty is a multifaceted phenomenon that has profound emotional impact on most individuals, while also displaying notable sensitivity to listeners' personality and musical background. In doing so, our study contributes to a more comprehensive account of what it means to experience beauty in music.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.