ArticlePloS one2025
Individual differences in feelings of certainty surrounding mixed emotions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural representation of mixed feelings during real-time processing of negative words in pun-humor.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ambivalence and uncertainty, though related, are distinct constructs. While research has explored the link between certainty judgements and ambivalence in the context of attitudes and beliefs, little is known about individual differences in how certain people feel about identifying their own ambivalent, or mixed, emotions in the moment. In two samples, we investigated the relationship between the intensity of mixed emotions and self-reported certainty of one's own current affective experience on a trial-to-trial basis. We additionally tested whether this relationship was moderated by personality and emotional traits. First, in a sample of 140 participants, we found a significant negative relationship between the intensity of mixed feelings and affective certainty, and this relationship was weaker in those with higher emotional intelligence. We next conducted a pre-registered online study with 311 participants in a sample more demographically representative of the United States. We replicated our finding that uncertainty was predicted by higher intensity of co-occurring positive and negative affect, but did not replicate the moderating effect of emotional intelligence. Trait meta-mood, however, did moderate this relationship. Our results show that despite the abstract nature of asking people to report how certain they are of how they feel, and potentially differing interpretations of the question, meaningful variation is found in responses. Future work can refine methods of gauging affective uncertainty, and the implication of affective certainty for mixed emotions on well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.