ArticlePloS one2025
Validation of a computational model of bone conduction sound reception in mysticetes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational models serve as useful complements to physical experiments, but they require validation to build confidence in their applicability. This study outlines the validation of biomechanical models for mysticete sound reception, specifically using experiments involving an instrumented gray whale skull exposed to underwater sound. Detailed descriptions of the models are provided. The models were evaluated using a set of similarity metrics applied to both measured and computed frequency response functions. While high-quality agreement was not achieved, the models corresponded reasonably well with observed experimental data. A sensitivity analysis examined the models' responses to variations in input material properties. Although these changes in material properties influenced model response, they accounted for only modest changes in similarity. A more significant challenge to achieving higher accuracy was the mismatch between the acoustic waves generated in experiments and the models' assumption of plane wave loading. Despite this, the models successfully captured important biomechanical behavior, such as the enhancement of motion of the tympanic bullae relative to the basicranium. Model validation remains an ongoing endeavor, and this study represents an initial step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.