ArticlePloS one2025
Determinants and group differences in international undergraduates' engagement in Chinese higher education.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Student engagement is a crucial indicator of academic success, quality education, and overall development, encompassing behavioral, cognitive, and emotional dimensions. This study aimed to investigate the levels and key determinants of engagement among international undergraduate students in China, to gain a deeper understanding of the individual and contextual factors that shape their learning experiences. Data were collected from 721 international students enrolled in 21 non-double-first-class universities in Yunnan and Guangxi provinces, using a structured questionnaire adapted from the National Survey of Student Engagement-China, the China College Student Survey, and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. The results revealed a moderate level of overall engagement (M = 4.02 on a 5-point scale), with emotional engagement scoring the highest (M = 4.10), followed by behavioral (M = 3.99) and cognitive engagement (M = 3.98). A gender-based analysis revealed significant differences in cognitive performance (p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.27) and overall engagement (p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.17), with males scoring higher. Academic discipline and grade level were also significantly associated with engagement dimensions, while Chinese language proficiency showed no significant effect. Regression and Structural Equation Modeling(SEM) analyses identified cultural adaptation (β = 0.35), self-efficacy (β = 0.34), teacher behavioral support (β = 0.29), and peer behavioral support (β = 0.25) as strong and significant predictors, collectively explaining over 60% of the variance in students' overall engagement(χ²/df = 2.12, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.04, and SRMR = 0.03). The findings suggest that institutions must strengthen culturally responsive pedagogies, enhance support structures, and promote active learning strategies to improve international students' engagement and academic success in Chinese higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.