ArticlePloS one2025
Modeling the impact of cochlear nerve degeneration on speech recognition performance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cochlear nerve degeneration (CND), including the loss of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), has emerged as a likely contributor to "hidden hearing loss", a condition in which listeners experience speech-in-noise difficulties that cannot be fully explained by audiometric thresholds. This form of primary neural de-afferentation preferentially affects low- and medium-spontaneous rate (SR) fibers, which are critical for encoding acoustic features such as amplitude modulations, especially under challenging listening conditions such as noisy backgrounds. Although CND is well established in animal models and post-mortem human studies, its perceptual consequences remain poorly understood due to the inability to directly assess synaptic integrity in living humans. Here, we combined behavioral testing, a phenomenological model of the auditory periphery, and deep neural network (DNN) decoding to quantify the perceptual impact of SR-specific fiber loss. Audiometric thresholds and word recognition scores for time-compressed, reverberant NU-6 words were obtained from 395 cognitively normal adults aged 18-80. To isolate the neural contribution to speech encoding, we simulated ANF activity under three CND profiles that varied the survival of SR classes, transformed responses into time-frequency neurograms, and decoded them with two DNN architectures trained on word classification. Both networks learned the task, but only the deeper, more constrained model produced recognition scores consistent with human performance and showed sensitivity to CND, with recognition declining as low- and medium-SR fibers were removed. These findings provide a mechanistic link between SR-specific synaptopathy and speech-in-noise difficulties and establish a computational framework for evaluating the perceptual impact of hidden hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.