Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41237152›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Design, 3D printing, and preclinical validation of an extraglottic ramp to facilitate blind orotracheal intubation in emergency airway management.

Jorman H Tejada-Perdomo, Valentina Gutierrez-Perdomo, Juana V Agudelo-Castro, Jorge A Pérez-Gamboa, Alejandro Weinstein, Sebastián San Martín, Rodrigo Salas, Jorge A Ramos-Castaneda

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jorman H Tejada-PerdomoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5972-771X
Valentina Gutierrez-PerdomoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia.
Juana V Agudelo-CastroDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8983-9296
Jorge A Pérez-GamboaDiseñador Industrial, Neiva, Colombia.
Alejandro WeinsteinDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-7003
Sebastián San MartínCenter of Interdisciplinary Biomedical and Engineering Research for Health (MEDING), School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Rodrigo SalasCenter of Interdisciplinary Biomedical and Engineering Research for Health (MEDING), Biomedical Engineering School, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-6811
Jorge A Ramos-CastanedaResearch Group Innovación y Cuidado, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Neiva, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of devices that facilitate rapid airway isolation is essential when managing critical patients in emergencies. In recent years, additive manufacturing has emerged as an innovative, versatile, and accessible technology for developing medical devices. This study presents the design, development, and validation of an extraglottic medical device created using computer-aided design tools and stereolithographic 3D printing to facilitate blind intubation by first responders. The device was iteratively modeled and fabricated with biocompatible materials; validation in airway simulators and human cadaveric specimens assessed dimensions, friction, intubation technique, and learning curve, and ease of use was rated with a Likert scale. Ten iterations led to a final design with low friction and minimal cervical manipulation; ramp angle, cup geometry, and distal tip were optimized for tube passage, and BioMed Flex 80A showed high strength and anatomical compatibility. The final version is a safe, reusable, and functional alternative for airway management and blind orotracheal intubation, particularly in emergencies and resource-limited settings; clinical validation in live patients is still needed.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementEquipment DesignIntubation, IntratrachealPrinting, Three-DimensionalCadaverComputer-Aided DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID41237152
PMCPMC12617943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.