ArticlePloS one2025
Deciphering CO2 flux and fluorescent DOM origins in the carbon cycle of Kaptai Lake.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the current water quality, identify the sources of fluorescent dissolved organic matter (fDOM), and quantify the CO2 flux from Kaptai Lake surface water. A water quality multiparameter analyzer, a membrane-enclosed pCO2 sensor, and a weather monitoring device were deployed to continuously record data over 48 hours to observe daily and spatial shifts. All measured water quality parameters remained within the acceptable limits set by the Department of Environment (DoE). The three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix (3D-EEM) analysis identified distinct fluorophores at peak A (Ex/Em = 245/404 nm), peak M (Ex/Em = 310/404 nm), peak T (Ex/Em = 280/338-346 nm), and peak Tuv (Ex/Em = 230/338-350 nm). Parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) modelling further resolved these into protein-like components and fulvic-like substances, specifically C-like and M-like fluorophores, indicating the presence of both microbial and terrestrial sources. Spatial distribution patterns of fDOM intensity suggest variability driven by localized pollution sources across the lake. Optical indices further indicated that the fDOM components were predominantly biologically derived, characterized by low aromaticity, lower molecular weight and size, and were largely influenced by microbial degradation processes. Diurnal monitoring of partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) in the lake water revealed values ranging from 577 to 1045 µatm. Correspondingly, the CO2 flux (FCO2) varied between 45 and 56 mmol CO2 m ⁻ 2 d ⁻ 1. The positive average FCO₂ indicates that the lake acts as a net source of CO2 to the regional atmosphere. Higher pCO2 levels are linked to lower dissolved oxygen and increased protein-like DOM that fuels microbial respiration, while humic-like DOM helps stabilize carbon by limiting CO2 release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.