Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41237120›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Determinants of caesarean section use in Ghana: A trend analysis of 2003-2022 DHS data.

Johnson Sam, Christian Kasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johnson SamDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1813-3792
Christian KasuEssikado Hospital, Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global rise in caesarean section (CS) delivery has raised significant public health concerns, particularly regarding drivers and potential health implications. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends CS rates between 5% and 15%, global averages exceed this range, with regional disparities and medically unjustified procedures contributing to the increase. In Ghana, similar trends are emerging amid infrastructural and referral system limitations, yet limited studies have used nationally representative data to track changes over time. This study used data from the 2003, 2008, 2014, and 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys (GDHS) to examine trends and determinants of CS among women aged 15-49 years who had a live birth in the five years preceding the survey. Weighted descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression were employed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for predictors, accounting for the complex survey design. Key variables included survey year, antenatal care (ANC) attendance, maternal education, household wealth, birth size, multiple births, maternal age, and birth order. CS prevalence rose from 4.4% in 2003 to 20.1% in 2022 (p < 0.001). Clinical predictors included multiple births (OR≈5.0), first-order births and larger perceived birth size. Non-clinical factors also strongly influenced CS use: higher education, maternal age ≥ 30 years richest wealth quintile (OR≈3.5), frequent antenatal care attendance, and urban residence increased odds, while rural residence reduced odds. Temporal effects remained strong even after adjustment, underscoring a systemic rise in CS. CS delivery in Ghana has risen sharply over two decades, driven by both clinical and non-clinical factors, including socioeconomic status, education, and healthcare access. Policy interventions should focus on monitoring CS indications, ensuring equitable access, and safeguarding against medically unnecessary procedures.

Identifiers

PMID41237120
PMCPMC12617872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.