ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Recognition method of bridge apparent defects based on image processing and improved convolutional neural networks.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-06-23Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an important transportation hub, the detection of appearance defects in bridges has been characterized by low accuracy and low efficiency. To address this problem, the study proposes a bridge appearance defect recognition model based on image processing and improved convolutional neural network. The model is divided into three different modules. The first module is the bridge appearance defect classification and recognition module based on transfer learning and convolutional network. The second module further localizes the region of defective cracks based on the classification and recognition results. This module uses improved fast region convolutional neural network for region segmentation to further determine the location of cracks in the image. Finally, operations such as corrosion and expansion are performed on the cracks through morphological theory to further extract the crack size information. The results indicated that the detection accuracy, missed detection rate, false detection rate, response time, and size calculation accuracy of the proposed appearance defect recognition model were 98.2%, 0.6%, 0.5%, 1.9s, and 97.8%, respectively. Compared with the previous method, the positioning accuracy of the improved method is increased by 5.46%, and the area under the receiver operating curve is increased by 0.11. It can be concluded that the proposed appearance defect detection and identification model can realize a more refined defect identification, which in turn provides a reliable basis for the routine maintenance and health condition monitoring of bridges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.