ArticlePloS one2025
Fatty acid profiles from twenty-one plant species identified as palatable for pasture-raised laying hens.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A study was conducted to determine the fatty acid (FA) profiles of 21 plants voluntarily eaten by pasture-raised hens. Samples were collected from a very humid premontane forest during two dry and two rainy seasons within a year. FA were analyzed as methyl esters using a gas chromatograph coupled with a flame ionization detector. In general, no major changes in total saturated (SFAs), monounsaturated (MUFAs) or polyunsaturated FA (PUFAs) were observed within each plant among the four sampling times. However, for seven plants, large differences (3 times as much) in MUFAs content were observed and for Heliconia sp. the PUFAs content in the January sampling was almost double than the one found in July (43.3 vs 22.2%). On the other hand, large interspecies differences were observed in FA composition; for instance, Bidens rubifolia was predominantly PUFA-rich while Musa paradisiaca and Heliconia sp. were predominantly SFA-rich. The predominant FA in 86% of the plants were the PUFAs ɑ-linolenic acid (ALA, omega-3) and linoleic acid (LA, omega-6), and in almost all plants, the omega-6 content was lower than the omega-3 content. Therefore, the omega-6 to omega-3 FA ratio in all plants ranged from 0.1 to 1.1, which is an ideal ratio to improve the n-6/n-3 ratio of egg yolks. Interestingly, maize leaves were found to contain a high percentage of ALA and n-6/n-3 ratios ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 and could therefore be considered in pasture-raised laying hens. The results of the present study indicate that grazing plants can be a sustainable alternative source of n-3 FA for laying hens, in replacement of expensive marine sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.