Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236860›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

A jackknife approach to estimate the prediction uncertainty from binary classifiers under right-censoring.

Antje Jahn-Eimermacher, Lukas Klein, Gunter Grieser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antje Jahn-EimermacherDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-5340
Lukas KleinDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1413-497X
Gunter GrieserEuropean University of Technology, European Union, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8489-1589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical prediction models are developed to estimate a patient's risk for a specific outcome, and machine learning is frequently employed to improve prediction accuracy. When the outcome is some event that happens over time, binary classifiers can predict the risk at specific time points if right-censoring is addressed by inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighting . Assessing prediction uncertainty is crucial for interpreting individual risks, but there is limited knowledge on how to consider inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighting when estimating this uncertainty. We propose an adjustment of the infinitesimal jackknife estimator for the standard error of predictions that incorporates inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighting. By using a nonparametric approach, it is broadly applicable, especially to machine learning classifiers. For a simple tractable example, we show that the proposed adjustment reveals unbiased standard error estimates. For other situations, we evaluate performance through simulation studies under both parametric models with inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighting-customized log-likelihood and machine learning with inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighting-customized loss function. We illustrate the methods by predicting post-transplant survival probabilities, using national kidney transplant registry data. Our findings show that the proposed estimator is useful for quantifying prediction uncertainty of inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighting classifiers. Applications to simulated and real data show that prediction uncertainty increases when employing binary classifiers on dichotomized data compared to predictions from survival models.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, StatisticalUncertaintyComputer SimulationHumansKidney TransplantationLikelihood FunctionsProbabilityinverse-probability-of-censoringmachine learningPredictionsurvival analysisuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41236860
PMCPMC12783380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.