ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026
Assessing factor consumption and bleeding outcomes of prophylaxis with 3 commonly prescribed factor IX products for hemophilia B: A retrospective patient medical record analysis in the United States.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laboratory Challenges in the Era of Novel Haemophilia Therapies.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the United States, rIX-FP, rFIXFc, and rFIX are approved as treatment options for people with hemophilia B (PwHB). Although clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of each product, real-world data can help to understand their use and treatment outcomes in the absence of direct head-to-head trials.
objectiveTo assess real-world factor IX (FIX) consumption and bleeding outcomes for PwHB receiving rIX-FP, rFIXFc, or rFIX prophylaxis.
methodsRetrospective, deidentified medical record information for PwHB with moderate or severe hemophilia B (FIX activity ≤5%) treated with rIX-FP, rFIXFc, or rFIX prophylaxis for at least 12 months was obtained from Hemophilia Treatment Centers in the United States between 2020 and 2023. FIX consumption was calculated using the most recently prescribed dosing frequency and dosage. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized spontaneous bleeding rate, and annualized joint bleeding rate were calculated based on the number of bleeding events over the observation period. Generalized linear models adjusting for covariates were used to test the statistical significance of the differences of consumption and ABR among the products.
resultsOverall, 213 PwHB (53% with severe disease) aged 12 years and older were included for main analysis, with a mean age (range) of 32.7 (12-84) years. PwHB treated with rIX-FP prophylaxis had significantly lower mean FIX consumption compared with those receiving rFIXFc (45.8 vs 65.4 IU/kg/week;
conclusionsIn this retrospective study, rIX-FP prophylaxis was associated with lower FIX consumption and potentially improved protection against bleeds compared with prophylactic treatment with rFIXFc and rFIX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.