ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Tattoos in the general Swedish population: prevalence, determinants, and exposure characteristics.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tattoo ink on the European market has been reported to contain many human toxicants, which has raised concerns about health effects. Clarifying the exposure distribution in the population is key to understanding potential public health implications. We investigated the prevalence of tattoos in a population-based Swedish cohort of 13 046 individuals aged 20-68 years with exposure data collected through a questionnaire in 2021. In addition, we characterized the tattooed population in terms of sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants and exposure characteristics using multivariable logistic regression, regressing tattoo status on sex, age, educational attainment, marital status, smoking, snuff use, and alcohol consumption. The age-standardized tattoo prevalence was estimated at 29% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27%-30%). Tattoos were more common in the younger age groups, particularly among females. Males were younger when they received their first tattoo and tended to have a larger tattooed body surface. Tattoo exposure was associated with unfavourable socioeconomic characteristics, with the highest odds ratio observed for current smokers compared with never-smokers (2.86; 95% CI 2.42-3.38). Our results suggest that any tattoo-related adverse effects may exacerbate existing inequalities in health. Additionally, the high prevalence in younger age groups indicates a likely shift in the characteristics of the tattooed population over time, which may have further implications for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.