ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine on HPV type replacement and sexual behaviors in the post-vaccine era: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been implemented for more than 15 years to prevent HPV infection and associated precancerous lesions. However, limited data are available regarding the long-term impacts of HPV vaccination, particularly concerning cross-protection and type replacement. Using data from the 2007-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we employed the survey-weighted Student's t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models to examine the association between vaccine effectiveness and timing of vaccination. Among 9040 females aged 18 years and over, vaccination showed great effectiveness against both vaccine-targeted and non-vaccine-targeted high-risk HPV (hrHPV) among those vaccinated before sexual debut. After full adjustment, participants vaccinated after sex had a 48% increased risk of hrHPV infection (OR (95% CI) = 1.48 (1.16, 1.88)) compared to unvaccinated participants, and their sexual behaviors were more active as well. The most prevalent HPV subtypes were HPV 16/51/52/66, and the prevalence of subtypes 18/35/52/66/68 differed significantly across racial groups. Despite the prevalence of most hrHPV subtypes declined continuously or fluctuated over time, it is noteworthy that the infection rate of HPV 66 increased by 59% compared to the unvaccinated (95% CI: 0.18-0.92). Continuous surveillance is warranted for hrHPV types antigenically distant from vaccine strains, as early type replacement may be emerging. Given the notable difference in effectiveness based on vaccination timing, public-health education should emphasize both the benefits and limitations of HPV vaccination in the context of sexual health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.