ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Evaluating the Predictive Validity of the Fordham Risk Screening Tool (FRST) for Violent Behavior during Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitalization.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior research has shown the Fordham Risk Screening Tool (FRST) to be accurate in assessment of violence risk when compared to more comprehensive risk assessment instruments. However, a link between any violence risk screening tool and actual markers of violent behavior is absent in the literature. This study, therefore, sought to determine whether the FRST could be used to accurately assess the likelihood of violence, and markers of violence, during an inpatient psychiatric admission. This retrospective health records survey examined data from a consecutive cohort of adults (N = 423) admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit from the emergency department (ED) from September 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023. Both electronic and manual abstraction strategies were used to evaluate FRST screening tool results collected in the ED and markers of violent behavior during subsequent inpatient hospitalization. When comparing the proportion of subjects who experienced a violent incident while hospitalized in the FRST positive and FRST negative groups, a significant difference was noted with a greater proportion of those with a positive FRST screening experiencing a violent event (33.0% vs. 8.1%, for the positive and negative screening groups, respectively, χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
41236710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.