Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41236652›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Temporal dynamics of the twinkle-goes illusion and its relationship to neural theta oscillations.

Ryohei Nakayama, Kaoru Amano, Ikuya Murakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryohei NakayamaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. ryohei.nakayama.ac@gmail.com.
Kaoru AmanoGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Ikuya MurakamiDepartment of Psychology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual motion signals are useful in predicting the future, and can affect the detectability and phenomenology of vision in various ways. Recent research has demonstrated that the disappearance position of a moving object is perceived as shifted in the direction of motion when the background consists of dynamic noise. This "twinkle-goes" illusion is thought to arise from a positional prediction overshoot that occurs because dynamic noise delays the accumulation of sensory evidence needed to register the disappearance. In Experiment 1, we examined the temporal dynamics of this illusion by measuring the illusory position shift using a probe at various positions along the motion trajectory and at different time points after the object's physical vanishing. The illusory position shift was nearly zero at the moment the moving object vanished, and subsequently gradually increased as a function of time up to ~ 120 ms after vanishing. In Experiment 2, motivated by prior reports of rhythmic fluctuations in both behavior and neural activity, we investigated whether neural theta oscillations were involved in the illusion. We found that the size of the illusory position shift correlated with the theta phase before vanishing. Taken together, these results suggest that the positional prediction of a moving object is slow-paced and rhythmically updated in synchrony with theta oscillations.

Indexed as

IllusionsMotion PerceptionOptical IllusionsTheta RhythmAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung AdultEEGPositional prediction overshootTheta phaseTwinkle-goes illusion

Identifiers

PMID41236652
PMCPMC12618427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.